Pre Diabetic Is The Verge Of Having Type 2 Diabetes

The individual used in this paper was a 56-year-old female that is pre-diabetic but is on the verge of having type 2 diabetes. The individual has been dealing with diabetes for the last 4 years. She stated that she was placed on Metformin 3 years ago to help control blood glucose levels. The individual states that she did not take her Metformin like she was suppose to and was having trouble keeping her A1C down. She stated that her primary care physician recommended she tried to control her blood glucose through diet and exercise and if she was able to do this she would be able to get of the Metformin. The individual decided that she would start a diet and exercise program that she found through a local hospital. After being on the diet and exercise plan for 9 months the individual was able to lose 30 pounds and for the first time in 2 years was able to get of Metformin. The individual stated that her A1C test score fell to 5.7%, which she stated her physician said she was on the boarder line of normal. She stated that in order to stay off Metformin she would have to keep A1C percent down. After a few months of being of Metformin the individual stated that she injured her knee and she relapsed back to old habits. Over the last 4 months the individual states she has put on 20-30 pounds and her A1C % is up to 6.1% and is now back on Metformin. When asked about how she perceived what it meant to be healthy she stated that being healthy was not being over weight,Show MoreRelatedSymptoms And Treatment Of Diabetes1485 Words   |  6 Pageswith diabetes, and 86 million are living with pre-diabetes, a serious health condition that increases a person’s risk of type 2 diabetes and other chronic diseases. â€Å" (Center for Disease Control and Prevention 2016) Diabetes is a crippling disease that has complications that can drastically change a once normal life, but the appropriate medical and nutritional therapy can help to manage and reduce the risk of developing such complications. â€Å"1.4 million Americans are diagnosed with diabetes everyRead MoreMarketing Mistakes and Successes175322 Words   |  702 PagesIncludes index. ISBN 978-0-470-16981-0 (pbk.) 1. Marketing—United States—Case studies. I. Title. HF5415.1.H37 2009 658.800973—dc22 2008040282 ISBN-13 978-0-470-16981-0 Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 PREFACE Welcome to the 30th anniversary of Marketing Mistakes and Successes with this 11th edition. Who would have thought that interest in mistakes would be so enduring? Many of you are past users, a few even for decades. I hope you will

Analysis Of Huey Long And Father Coughlin - 1956 Words

In the beginning there were politics with their politicians and catholicism with its priests. The two most public of both of these groups were Huey Long and Father Coughlin. Long won political power and position after becoming a lawyer and politician by championing for the little guy against large businesses. Coughlin came to national presence after being the first preacher to successfully utilize the radio to bring attention to his church and faith that later took on a large political role. Both of these men lead campaigns that focused on large business, the extremely rich and the working poor and how to best make their lives better. Huey Long started off his law and political career by making a long outlook prediction for himself. First he would run for a secondary office in his home state of Louisiana, then he would run for governor, after winning that office he would move on to run for the senate, and after that he would win the office of President of the United States. To begin accomplishing his goals he left his job as a traveling salesman and, with the help of his brother and a friend, moved to New Orleans and began attending law school in Tulane. After attending school for a year he requested a special bar exam and passed with flying colors. Soon after, Long moved back to his home town of Winnfield and shared an office with his brother Julius. While practicing law he took many different types of cases but the majority of his cases were in a new fieldShow MoreRelatedAmerican Revolution and Study Guide Essay example5377 Words   |  22 Pagescontinued to arrive to America. (10pts) 2. Assess the extent to which the Great Awakening, an intensely religious movement, contributed to the development of separation between church and state in America. (10pts) 3. Identify the short-term and long-term consequences of the American colonists seeking foreign markets for their exports? (10pts) 4. Write your definition of democracy. The use this definition to create a T-chart to analyze the validity of democracy developing in colonial America Read MoreEssays for the American Pageant, 14th Ed.11068 Words   |  45 Pagesdo to win the Presidency. They needed a candidate who could be portrayed as a hero and a commoner to appeal to the voting masses in the West. This candidate was William Henry Harrison. He had won some battles fighting Indians much earlier in his long life, one of which was the Battle of Tippecanoe. An opposing newspaper said that Harrison should stay home in his log cabin and drink hard cider. This validated the approach of Harrison’s supporters who held rallies and marches to promote the image

Terrorism as a politically motivated Violence Sample for Students

Question: Discuss about the Terrorism as a Politically motivated Violence. Answer: The essay contains the aspects of terrorism and the violence. The terrorism includes both factors that are terror as well as violence. The aim of the essay is to analyze the ways different aspects that are related to terrorism. The essay includes the reason of the influence of politics in terrorism. The political scenario is undergoing a massive change in the present day and this is the reason it is important to study the changes made in the politics. It has undoubtedly played a heavy role on the violence that has been remained an influencing factor for the violence that is created in the present world. Terrorism is the outcome of unaware hatred towards the person who is the victim of the hatred. The reason of terrorism is ultimate hatred and in maximum times it is because of the desire of the attainment of the political powers. The use of force in an illegal manner or the execution of force against the individuals or any kinds of property in order to intimidate a government in furth erance of the political objectives is the actual reason of terrorism (Reid Meloy and Yakeley 2014). According to Schuurman and Horgan (2016), Terrorism is the use of the intentional indiscriminate violence as a means of creating terror or fear in order to achieve certain goal which is political in many cases. The terms like `Terror` and `Terrorism` originated during the French Revolution during the late 18th century. In the last years there has been no specific definition of terrorism. This is roughly defined as an activity that is morally wrong. Terrorism is sometimes defined by many people as a religion. It is believed by many people that terrorism is spread by those people who believe in a particular religion. This is a wrong concept that is believed by many people. Terrorism itself is a wrong belief. Terrorism is practiced by those people who belief in violence. The terrorists who created by the terrorists and they believe in spreading violence. The creation of the violence is sometimes the politically motivated. In most of the times it is politically motivated. In maximum time s it has been noticed that the political attack is the result of certain political issues. It is the attainment of the powers related to the rule of the government in any region. In many cases it has been observed that the terrorist acts has been occurred due to the desire of conquering an entire region. According to a renowned political philosopher Michael Walzer, terrorism has been described as the purposeful assassination of the innocent people randomly in order to spread serious threat across the entire population. It included forcing alliances with the political leaders. Many critics argued that terrorism is an act that intends to cause death and it ends up in serious bodily harm to civilians. The concept has lead to controversial definitions and meanings (Sidanius et al. 2016). The term has political and emotional aspects related to it. Though it has been sometimes argued that terrorist and criminals are the same concept. This has been refuted by many critics. Terrorism is tho ught to be ineluctably political in arms and motives. It is usually violent and it includes threatening. It includes the far-reaching psychological repercussions which are beyond the interest of the victim. It has been found that it is conducted by many organizations with an identifiable chain of the authoritative command. It is sometimes the result of the conspiration. The terrorists attacks are the outcome of the conspiracy of the conspirators (Pauwels and Schils 2016.). However there are varied views of the concept of terrorism. The above discussions are some aspects of terrorism but there are other concept as well that explores the idea of terrorism. It is different angles. It has various viewpoints in different regions. The concept of terrorism is viewed as political violence by many critics. Terrorism has certain purpose. The major intention of terrorism is to enslave the medium in order to achieve maximum attainable publicity which is a powerful in order to justify their action and convince the audiences. The major reason of spreading the terrorism is to affect larger number of people. The main objective of terrorism is to affect the political purpose. The picture of political influence comes into the scenario when the terrorism is related to religion. It has found that in case of certain official governmental definitions of terrorism uses the criteria of illegitimate and unlawful act. It has been mentioned by the U.S president Barack Obama, com mented that the bomb blasts which are the activity of a terrorist attack intends to drop bombs in the place where the innocent civilians are targeted. The bombs are used to target the innocent people. This is where the concept of international terrorism creeps in. It implies the violent acts and dangerous acts. It appeared to be intends towards the coercion of the civilian population. The actions include the influence of any particular government by the destruction of the mass which includes the assassination of the innocent people and sometimes kidnapping of the mass people which is put into action by hijacking a plane and similar actions. The act of terrorism occurs usually outside the territorial jurisdiction of any region (Pauwels and De Waele 2014). The above views are critical and they are judged from the point of view of the normal individuals. On the contrary the terrorists have different view point and their actions are justified according to them. The terrorist argue that they express their wants through the terrorist acts. The terrorist does not think their want is unjustified. There are specific reasons for which the terrorists claim that their actions are the outcome of the unjust they received. The government is seen in many cases to join hands with the terrorists secretly applying the policy of give and take (Valentino 2014). The claims of the terrorists are in maximum times motivated by the political aspects. The political terrorism includes the harsh and violent criminal acts that includes primarily of generating the fear in the community for certain political purpose. The apolitical terrorism implies, it is not aimed at the political purpose rather it certainly exhibits the intended structure to continue to a huge d egree of fear for the forceful purposes. In spite of that in the end there is the gain and interest of every individual or collective profit rather than the achievement of the political purpose (Nacos 2016). There have been many instances of such terrorist attacks where the influence of the politics has been huge. Politics had remained a great reason for many terrorist attacks. The best example of this was the September 11th Attacks on the United States in the year 2001. This resulted in the destruction of the World Trade Centre in the city of New York. In such cases terrorism was used to achieve the political goals. This was executed by the use of terror and violence. The target of the terrorist in this case was the government officials, the identified group of individuals and specific groups and some innocent bystanders. In most cases it has been identified that terrorists aims at seeking and overthrowing an established and existing political regime. This view can be contracted as well as in many cases it has been found that the dictatorial governments sometimes use the method of terror in order to maintain their own power (Nacos 2016). According to Pain (2014), there has been another instance like the Oklahoma City Bombing incident. He argued that poverty played a major role in the spread of terrorism. In the year 1997, the murder and the trial of Trimothy J.Mc. Veigh were found ended in the death sentence. In the incident the 29-year-old former Army sergeant was found guilty of dropping bomb at the Federal building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995. The incident took away the lives of 168 people. It has been documented as the worst terrorist act that ever happened in the soil of US. The attack of September 11, 2011 is the most severe act that has been recorded in the past years. This was definitely not the first terrorist attack that occurred in US. Despite this fact it was one of the most disastrous events that were witnessed by the United States. The attack took place in the World Trade Centre. The dropping of the bomb left a deep crater of 200 by 1000 feet wide and five stories deep. The attacks included the d amage of the government facilities. This is basically termed as the domestic terrorism. There was political motif behind this (Mills, Freilich and Chermak 2017). The motif includes the damage of the government in order to get their rights and fulfill their demands. The attack of September 11 the attacks have been found to be the continuation process of a series of events of the deadly terrorist activities that had occurred in many places. It was considered as an effective medium of the political groups in many continents like Asia, Middle East and Europe. The international terrorism gradually experienced a growth which included the act of kidnapping, Hijack of many airplanes, bombing of the airplanes and the attacks with the arms on the facilities of public by the government. The main leader and the responsible person behind the attack was Bin Laden and he revealed a religious edict that was known as fatwah and he therefore called for the attacks on the troops of U.S and the U.S civ ilians. The U.S government has shown certain response to the international terrorist organizations and the nations that had lend their support to the terrorist act (Martin 2017). The other countries supported them by lending them the military support and the government supported them entirely. Even during the attacks and revolutions during the French and the industrial revolution the government of certain countries did lend support to the other countries. This was the reason terrorism gained motivation from the political affairs. The political system was in many cases corrupt and they were the real reason behind the spread of the terrorism (Marsden 2017). In the case of the use of the right of power of the resistance and the political offence in case of the purpose of the clarification of the moral, political justification over certain violent acts, terrorism is usually defined with the contradictory effect, known as the mark of disgrace through any process which can provide any kind of clarification for a certain violent denial of act (Lupu and Peisakhin 2017). It is in favor of appearance that while terrorism is defined by the requirement of the concurrent existence of few factors that includes in it any reservation that is related to the right of the resistance or the crimes that are political in nature. The legitimizing functions are inclusive of the notions that would in any situation not extend the ability to the violent acts that meet all the circumstances (Juergensmeyer 2017). The effects of the terrorism had a social and a political impact. The political impact of terrorism included the political effect of the same. The social pattern and the social order, the governance power of the society and the politics of a region completely rely on good communication. The act of terrorism has a dramatic influence in the entire world. It was evident in the attacks of the September, 11 attack of the year 2001 (Jongman 2017). The concept of terrorism is predicted to cause harm to the communication and the responsive behavior to the issues as well as to have the consequences for the society and the politics (Jasko, LaFree and Kruglanski 2017). The reason for stating terrorism as a universal act is it can be performed in any region and in any country. The command of the leaders and the control of the terrorist groups, the recruitment, the training, and the active operations and the target victims can be located in many other different countries. The political and the go vernmental organization need to define and justify the ways definition of terrorism (Spalek 2016). It is used for the reason of public relation or spin in order to influence their elective to proof the fact that they are taking effective initiative to counter terrorism and gain acceptance of laws or measures which are harder to accept for any other purpose. President Bush categorized terrorists as a conventional military enemy and it legitimizes the conventional military action rather than the measures of the counter-terrorist which is able to interpret by the US electorate as being extremely soft. The administration of Obama has shifted from the military to counter-terrorism and since then has actually been accused of being extremely soft (Heger 2015). The most important political effect is the opportunity that the government has while introducing the laws that are harsher than it is usually the case. The laws are usually intended towards the act of terrorism instead of that it frequently acts as sufficient extensive or intrusive in order to increase the government power in general. The aim of the terrorist act is to provoke the inappropriate reaction of the governments. However it is important that the politicians come up with the truthful definitions and meanings of terrorism (Freilich and LaFree 2015.). It would help the public to receive education and reassurance in order to preserve their civil rights. It can sometimes be seen that the government and the politicians define the act of terrorism as the act of repression, victimization, as the act of demonizing their opponents, civilians and the act of act of repression of their political bodies and religions. The authoritarian states witnesses this much than the democratic ones. The term has been misused by many politicians and many governmental organizations. The misuse of the meaning and definition of the terrorism sometimes have far reaching after effects of social and political aspects. The person who is found guilty of the same is found to be guilt of performing terrorism is found to lose all civil rights (Ferguson, Burgess and Hollywood 2015.). It has been argued by Eager (2016), that the terrorists has different concept of the activity of terrorism. Their views are different from those of the view of the society. They believe that they are freedom fighters, revolutionary figures and insurgents. The terrorists termed the act of terrorism as the good and the bad terrorism. Terrifying an innocent person is an injustice act. The act of unjustly terrorizing people is not an ethical thing. On the other hand terrorizing the oppressors and the criminals is of extreme importance for the safety and the security of the people and it includes the protection of their property. The terrorizing and the punishing process of the criminals are necessary steps to straighten the facts and to make them correct. After this there is a continuation of the process of social and political impacts. It is however a matter of fact that terrorism will remain to continue in order to define the acts of the terrorism to justify themselves. The act of terr orism will definitely exist; the major reason behind this is that there will always be individuals and groups that get the assurance and motivation from this type of self-justification (Cottam et al. 2015). Media has a large role to play in this. The acts of terrorism are brought out to the entire world through the coverage of the media. Media has a different concept for the concept of terrorism. For media it is the concept that would influence the audience to read the newspapers and the news articles. Media targets the audience to watch more news channels and to watch more television programs. The terrorism is used by them as a word to capture the attention of the audience. The audience receives the education of terrorism through media. Media therefore plays a major role in this. The wrong interpretation of the term could end up in delivering wrong meaning of the term (Combs 2015). The term should be used and interpreted by the media rightfully. More than the term the events needs to be portrayed in an authentic manner. In many cases it has been seen that the terrorists events has been portrayed in a wrongful manner. In many cases it has been seen that the telecast of the events has be en done in an exaggerated manner. This gave a wrong message to the audience. This gave a wrong message to the audience. However there is a wrong concept of national crime and terrorist attacks. The national crime includes the crime committed by any individual but for his own purpose and it does not have any international appeal. It does not have any political influence. The act of terrorism includes the suffering of the innocent people and that which has a universal appeal. It has political goals (Antonello 2017). Therefore, while concluding this can be mentioned that the terrorism is a crime that can be termed as a crime under international law. Terrorism is basically a psychological act that can be communicated through the violence and sometimes there has been a threat to violence. There have been a lot of motivations of terrorism which includes separatism, ethnocentrisms, revolution and nationalism. The ideological categories have been created by the political, religious and the social purpose. The ideologies are basically framed by the political purpose. The indigenous terrorists are grown in the home country itself. They are naturalized citizen of the nation. In such cases the political background plays a major role in motivating the terrorists. The international terrorists include the group of individuals that can be visualized as operating primarily between two nations and in other geographic regions. The terrorism is becoming violent than before and even in the present ages. The intern ational group of terrorists operates in multiple places. Terrorism has remained a politically as well as a socially motivated activity. It can be stopped only by imparting proper education to the individuals and to make efforts to eradicate poverty which serves as a major factor of terrorism. Terrorism leads to the destruction of not only a place but an entire community. It is the ultimate spread of extreme violence. The political factors add as a fuel to the fire in this case. References Antonello, P., 2017.Imagining terrorism: the rhetoric and representation of political violence in Italy 1969-2009. Routledge. Combs, C.C., 2015.Terrorism in the twenty-first century. Routledge. Cottam, M.L., Mastors, E., Preston, T. and Dietz, B., 2015.Introduction to political psychology. Routledge. Eager, P.W., 2016.From freedom fighters to terrorists: women and political violence. Routledge. Ferguson, N., Burgess, M. and Hollywood, I., 2015. Leaving violence behind: Disengaging from politically motivated violence in Northern Ireland.Political Psychology,36(2), pp.199-214. Freilich, J.D. and LaFree, G., 2015. Criminology theory and terrorism: Introduction to the special issue. Heger, L.L., 2015. Votes and violence: Pursuing terrorism while navigating politics.Journal of Peace Research,52(1), pp.32-45. Jasko, K., LaFree, G. and Kruglanski, A., 2017. Quest for significance and violent extremism: The case of domestic radicalization.Political Psychology,38(5), pp.815-831. Jongman, A.J., 2017.Political terrorism: A new guide to actors, authors, concepts, data bases, theories, and literature. Routledge. Juergensmeyer, M., 2017.Terror in the mind of God: The global rise of religious violence(Vol. 13). Univ of California Press. Lupu, N. and Peisakhin, L., 2017. The legacy of political violence across generations.American Journal of Political Science,61(4), pp.836-851. Marsden, S.V., 2017. Introduction. InReintegrating Extremists(pp. 1-20). Palgrave Macmillan UK. Martin, G., 2017.Understanding terrorism: Challenges, perspectives, and issues. SAGE publications. Mills, C.E., Freilich, J.D. and Chermak, S.M., 2017. Extreme hatred: Revisiting the hate crime and terrorism relationship to determine whether they are Close Cousins or Distant Relatives.Crime Delinquency,63(10), pp.1191-1223. Nacos, B., 2016.Mass-mediated terrorism: Mainstream and digital media in terrorism and counterterrorism. Rowman Littlefield. Nacos, B.L., 2016.Terrorism and counterterrorism. Routledge. Pain, R., 2014. Everyday terrorism: Connecting domestic violence and global terrorism.Progress in Human Geography,38(4), pp.531-550. Pauwels, L. and De Waele, M., 2014. Youth involvement in politically motivated violence: Why do social integration, perceived legitimacy, and perceived discrimination matter?.International Journal of Conflict and Violence,8(1), p.134. Pauwels, L. and Schils, N., 2016. Differential online exposure to extremist content and political violence: Testing the relative strength of social learning and competing perspectives.Terrorism and Political Violence,28(1), pp.1-29. Reid Meloy, J. and Yakeley, J., 2014. The violent true believer as a lone wolfpsychoanalytic perspectives on terrorism.Behavioral sciences the law,32(3), pp.347-365. Schuurman, B. and Horgan, J.G., 2016. Rationales for terrorist violence in homegrown jihadist groups: A case study from the Netherlands.Aggression and violent behavior,27, pp.55-63. Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Levin, S., Pratto, F. and Obaidi, M., 2016. Support for asymmetric violence among Arab populations: The clash of cultures, social identity, or counterdominance?.Group Processes Intergroup Relations,19(3), pp.343-359. Spalek, B., 2016.Counter-terrorism. Palgrave Macmillan. Valentino, B.A., 2014. Why we kill: The political science of political violence against civilians.Annual Review of Political Science,17, pp.89-103.

Outline Writing and Essay free essay sample

You may review exemplars Of both the rough and final drafts of a Take a Stand Essay. Getting Started: Topic 2 Brainstorm: As a college student, it is important for you to know how to prepare an essay. You should begin the writing process by brainstorming possible concepts you may want to write on and research. There are many ways you can brainstorm such as: Free Writing Listing Mapping/Webbing Take some time to brainstorm possible ideas for your essay. Here are some suggestions for getting started: Focus on a single problem or issue that is important to you.State the issue as a question using journalistic questions such as WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, and HOW? Relax the mind and body! Relaxation enhances alertness, so take time to reflect on the topic you selected. Brainstorm about three to four solutions to the problem you have chosen. Give yourself a time limit. Set a time limit for your brainstorming session (1 0 minutes is recommended), but allow for several solutions or ideas to your issue. We will write a custom essay sample on Outline: Writing and Essay or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page If you start to drift off topic; get refocused or stop and come back to the brainstorming when you are refreshed or have more time allotted. Evaluate your ideas. Once you have completed your brainstorming session, go back and evaluate your ideas and solutions. Your solutions should be rational and realistic, and obtainable before you proceed further with the writing process. Decide on your Audience: Who is the audience you are wishing to address? Who do you want your audience to know about the topic, or do you want to inform them on the issue you are taking a stand on? Will there be clues in your essay about who your audience is? For this assignment and essay, your instructor will be reading your essay; therefore you should write your essay in Third Person.Third Person: The most common form of writing at the academic level, and how you will write most of your formal essays. In Third Person, you are writing to an audience, and providing insight and information to inform and you will use such pronouns as he, she, or they. Second Person: This is most rare point of view used, because it is used to address another person, such as in an advice col umn or cookbook with directions given. This point of view uses you to address another person in the writing. First Person: Most widely used, and also most incorrectly used at the academic level.This is taken from your personal perspective, so you see the use of l and we throughout the writing. This form of writing should be used with personal perspective, reflection, or in autobiographies. Develop a Thesis Statement: You need to begin to organize your thoughts about your topic into a thesis statement. The thesis statement should inform the rest of your essay by stating your position and your supporting arguments clearly and concisely. Your thesis statement should be 1-2 sentences in length discussing your three main points you wish to address in the body paragraphs of your essay.This will be your last statement in the introduction paragraph, and will also help the reader see what will be discussed in the following paragraphs. Please review the lecture notes on thesis writing if you are not clear on the formatting, as this is an important element to get correct before continuing with your writing. Conduct Research: Once you have created your thesis statement and know the direction of your essay, you will need to begin collecting data on your selected topic to assist you in supporting the solutions to the issue you present in your essay.Using he GUCCI library, locate three to five PEER REVIEWED sources related to your thesis statement. Condense your data, organize it, examine each fact; try not to get stuck on one solution as you need to show support within each of your supporting body paragraphs. You are required to use at least 1 peer reviewed source within your essay, however it is good practice to begin using multiple sources as this will be a later expectation in future courses. Create an Outline of your Essay: It is essential to organize your thoughts about your selected topic by creating an essay ou tline.An outline will ensure that you stay on topic throughout your essay, as well as align to your thesis statement. *This will be part of your Topic 2 Assignment, so an outline format will be provided for you to follow. Writing your Rough and Final Drafts of the Essay: Topics 4 6 Rough Draft: Due in Topic 4 pull all your thoughts and ideas together and write a rough draft of your essay. Refining ideas is integral to completing the rough draft of any essay or writing project. To assist you with this portion, please access the GU Style Guide and Template located in: The Writing Center under the Student SuccessCenter in the Classroom. You should use this template and guide to complete your rough draft to ensure you have all format elements. There is also an assignment rubric that will provide you with details on what elements will be evaluated, and how your overall grade will be reviewed and applied to this assignment. Use the Academic Writing Resource located in the Course Materials; this is a great tool to use as you build and also review your writing. Proofread before submitting! You are expected to review your spell and grammar checks before submitting to your instructor; there should be no aromatically errors!